higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 05/23/2007 01:32:01 PM:
Yes, that's true. Mike, do you want to take out the system property
code altogether and use the setConfigurationBase method instead?
(One other place is the "STSConfiguration" string passed into
mapHandler.getSettings.)
Greg - please add the setConfigurationBase method.
Also change the code to expect a "Configuration" element rather than
STSConfiguration.
I also just realized that the handlers in Configuration.xml will
have to be changed to reflect the change in package name:
configuration.common to configuration.xml. (You probably already knew
this.)
I've changed this locally - will check in shortly.
Do you want me to change the code to be more generic, or do you want
to do this so that it coordinates with the changes in the STS code?
Go ahead and make the change ASAP.
...Greg
Tom Doman wrote:
Greg\Mike,
There are several STS references left in the configuration code but
I think most of them are just in comments. However, I did find one
that we need to fix and genericize. In org.eclipse.higgins.
configuration.xml, ConfigurationHandler.configure(), the system
property used and other references are still STS specific.
Thanks,
Tom
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
