Re: [higgins-dev] STS remnants in configuration code

[Michael McIntosh <mikemci@xxxxxxxxxx>]

higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 05/23/2007 01:32:01 PM:

> Yes, that's true.  Mike, do you want to take out the system property
> code altogether and use the setConfigurationBase method instead? 
> (One other place is the "STSConfiguration" string passed into 
> mapHandler.getSettings.)

Greg - please add the setConfigurationBase method.
Also change the code to expect a "Configuration" element rather than 
STSConfiguration.

> I also just realized that the handlers in Configuration.xml will 
> have to be changed to reflect the change in package name: 
> configuration.common to configuration.xml.  (You probably already knew 
this.)

I've changed this locally - will check in shortly.

> Do you want me to change the code to be more generic, or do you want
> to do this so that it coordinates with the changes in the STS code?

Go ahead and make the change ASAP.

> 
> ...Greg
> 
> 
> Tom Doman wrote: 
> Greg\Mike,
> 
> There are several STS references left in the configuration code but 
> I think most of them are just in comments.  However, I did find one 
> that we need to fix and genericize.  In org.eclipse.higgins.
> configuration.xml, ConfigurationHandler.configure(), the system 
> property used and other references are still STS specific.
> 
> Thanks,
> Tom
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev