| RE: [higgins-dev] Higgins.owl version 0.5.5 |
Hi Tom, You're right. There were two bugs. Both fixed here http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Second_Example_Context_Ontology Bug #1 was your #1 below: homePhone should indeed have had a domain of Person Bug #2 was that both homePhone and eyeColor should have ranges that are StringDatatypeAttribute (subclass of DatatypeAttribute, subclass of Attribute). More eyeballs wins again! -Paul > -----Original Message----- > From: higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:higgins-dev- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Doman > Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 5:43 PM > To: 'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions' > Subject: Re: [higgins-dev] Higgins.owl version 0.5.5 > > Paul, > > On the Person example ontology: > > 1. Should #homePhone have a domain? A domain of Person? > 2. Should #eyeColor have a range of #ObjectProperty like #homePhone? > The sample data seems to bear out that #eyeColor and #homePhone should > be quite similar. > > Tom > > >>> "Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 9/11/2006 12:11 AM >>> > http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Higgins_Ontology has been updated to > the > latest version of Higgins.owl (0.5.5). > > A simple example ontology based on Higgins.owl that defines a Person > class > as well as eyeColor and phoneNumber attributes can be found here > http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/Second_Example_Context_Ontology > > -Paul > _______________________________________________ > higgins-dev mailing list > higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev > _______________________________________________ > higgins-dev mailing list > higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev