| Re: [gemini-dev] switch for blueprint support |
Glyn, On 2013-04-22 09:09:01 +0100, Glyn Normington wrote: > Thanks for this Andrew. > > There is a design issue with multiple extenders competing to extend a > particular application bundle. The OSGi Alliance is defining some > standard generic capabilities that extenders can provide and > applications can require so that an application can say that it needs > a particular extender, although I'm not sure that much thought has > been given to selecting between distinct implementations of the same > extender standard. I'll mention this use case > So your patch is probably a necessary evil. ;-) Great, thanks for that. > Please could you raise a bug and attach the patch. ChainActivator > seems like a reasonable spot for the new logic. This is the ticket: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=406255 > Your patch would also be useful in scenarios where Gemini Blueprint > and Aries Blueprint need to co-exist, such as when running Aries > Subsystems in Virgo ([1]). Just having a look at this now.
Attachment:
pgpCaetCTIbzz.pgp
Description: PGP signature