Re: [gemini-dev] Re: Questions about Initial Contribution (SUA, license

[Costin Leau <cleau@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I had similar questions regarding Spring DM - see the replies on this CQ:
https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3810#c31

Hth,

On 4/15/2010 4:30 AM, Mike Keith wrote:
> Hi Bob,
> 
> 1. Yes, there will need to be a "notice.html" file for the SUA, and the
> wording will need to include pointers to both of the EPL and Apache v2
> license files. I expect that Eclipse legal folks will have a specific
> one for us when the IP has been fully approved.
> 
> 2. I don't think that "about.html" file has anything to do with whether
> the project is single or dual licensed, but it details the license and
> also the licenses of any project dependencies. I would expet each
> project to have an about.html file.
> 
> -Mike
> 
> On 4/14/2010 1:55 PM, Bob Nettleton wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>  
>> I'm preparing to create the CQs for the Gemini Naming project, and
>> have some questions about the "required notices" that must be included
>> in the code distribution.  These notices are mentioned on the
>> following wiki page:
>>  
>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/Initial_Contribution
>>  
>> 1. It looks like a "notice.html" needs to be included at the top-level
>> of the project, which includes the Software User Agreement.  Is there
>> particular wording we need to include in this notice, considering that
>> the Gemini projects are dual-licensed? 
>>  
>> 2. If I'm understanding the rules regarding "About.html" files, these
>> shouldn't be required, since all of our projects are dual-licensed. 
>> Is this correct? 
>>  
>> thanks,
>> Bob

-- 
Costin