Re: [gemini-dev] Re: Questions about Initial Contribution (SUA, license

[Mike Keith <michael.keith@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the link. It is good that your experience seems to line up 
with our thinking on it.

On 4/16/2010 11:35 AM, Costin Leau wrote:
> I had similar questions regarding Spring DM - see the replies on this CQ:
> https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3810#c31
>
> Hth,
>
> On 4/15/2010 4:30 AM, Mike Keith wrote:
>    
> > Hi Bob,
> >
> > 1. Yes, there will need to be a "notice.html" file for the SUA, and the
> > wording will need to include pointers to both of the EPL and Apache v2
> > license files. I expect that Eclipse legal folks will have a specific
> > one for us when the IP has been fully approved.
> >
> > 2. I don't think that "about.html" file has anything to do with whether
> > the project is single or dual licensed, but it details the license and
> > also the licenses of any project dependencies. I would expet each
> > project to have an about.html file.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > On 4/14/2010 1:55 PM, Bob Nettleton wrote:
> >      
> > > Hi Mike,
> > >
> > > I'm preparing to create the CQs for the Gemini Naming project, and
> > > have some questions about the "required notices" that must be included
> > > in the code distribution.  These notices are mentioned on the
> > > following wiki page:
> > >
> > > http://wiki.eclipse.org/Development_Resources/Initial_Contribution
> > >
> > > 1. It looks like a "notice.html" needs to be included at the top-level
> > > of the project, which includes the Software User Agreement.  Is there
> > > particular wording we need to include in this notice, considering that
> > > the Gemini projects are dual-licensed?
> > >
> > > 2. If I'm understanding the rules regarding "About.html" files, these
> > > shouldn't be required, since all of our projects are dual-licensed.
> > > Is this correct?
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Bob
> > >        
>