| Re: [epp-dev] Compare packages : +1 needed for Juno |
Thanks for the correction! +1 for Scout Regards, Judith -----Original Message----- From: epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Judith Gull Sent: Montag, 18. Juni 2012 11:00 To: chris.guindon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Eclipse Packaging Project Subject: Re: [epp-dev] Compare packages : +1 needed for Juno "RAP: Partially Included" is not checked yet for Scout. Is there a reason for this? Regards, Judith -----Original Message----- From: epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Judith Gull Sent: Freitag, 15. Juni 2012 07:49 To: chris.guindon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Eclipse Packaging Project Subject: Re: [epp-dev] Compare packages : +1 needed for Juno Hi Please change the following for the Scout package: - RCP/Platform: Included (with Source) (instead of Included) - JDT: Included (with Source) (instead of Included) - PDE: Included (with Source) (instead of Included) - RAP: Partially Included Thanks! Judith -----Original Message----- From: epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christopher Guindon Sent: Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2012 23:00 To: Eclipse Packaging Project Subject: [epp-dev] Compare packages : +1 needed for Juno Hi everyone, I am currently working on the compare package page for Juno and I need to get a +1 from all the package owner to confirm the information on the website. The automotive package is probably wrong here since it kept the same information from the JavaScript package. Finally was I right to remove C++ Linux and the JavaScript package from this page? http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/compare.php?test=true Thanks! _______________________________________________ epp-dev mailing list epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature