Re: [epp-dev] Parallel Package leverages CPP package

[Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>]

Yeah, I'm adding the autotools feature to CDT's. Jeff, does that mean we
can remove the linuxtools.autotools feature from the includes?

On 12-03-20 4:01 PM, "Jeff Johnston" <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Hey Beth,
>
>The autotools feature in the parallel feature.xml should be changed to
>reference the new CDT one (org.eclipse.cdt.autotools). Other than that,
>everything else from linuxtools remains the same.
>
>-- Jeff J.
>
>On 03/20/2012 03:36 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
>> Hey, Beth. The changes are already applied for Linux tools. I don't
>> think I need to change them any further at this point, at least for M6.
>>
>> From: Beth Tibbitts <tibbitts@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tibbitts@xxxxxxxxxx>>
>> Reply-To: Eclipse Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:21:13 -0400
>> To: Eclipse Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
>> Subject: [epp-dev] Parallel Package leverages CPP package
>>
>> I was just going to update the Parallel package today too, Doug.
>>
>> My original contents were CPP, plus some of Linux tools and of course
>> PTP and Photran.
>> I think I should get the new CPP list now.
>> Let me know when you are done.
>>
>>
>> ...Beth
>>
>> Beth Tibbitts
>> Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform http://eclipse.org/ptp
>> IBM STG - High Performance Computing Tools
>> Mailing Address: IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY
>>40511
>>
>> Inactive hide details for Doug Schaefer ---03/20/2012 12:20:43 PM---Hey
>> gang, Looking through the changes Linuxtools made to thDoug Schaefer
>> ---03/20/2012 12:20:43 PM---Hey gang, Looking through the changes
>> Linuxtools made to the CPP package to merge the two, I noticed
>>
>>
>>     From:
>>
>> 	
>> Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx <mailto:dschaefer@xxxxxxx>>
>>
>>     To:
>>
>> 	
>> "epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>" <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>,
>>
>>     Date:
>>
>> 	
>> 03/20/2012 12:20 PM
>>
>>     Subject:
>>
>> 	
>> [epp-dev] Include versus requires/import
>>
>>     Sent by:
>>
>> 	
>> epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Hey gang,
>>
>> Looking through the changes Linuxtools made to the CPP package to merge
>> the two, I noticed that they Include their features as opposed to add
>> them to the required section. I assume this was to allow for
>> optionality. Should we be including all our features this way? What's
>> the difference between include and require?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Doug._______________________________________________
>> epp-dev mailing list
>> epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ epp-dev mailing list
>> epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> epp-dev mailing list
>> epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
>
>_______________________________________________
>epp-dev mailing list
>epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev