Re: [epp-dev] Parallel Package leverages CPP package

[Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hey Beth,

The autotools feature in the parallel feature.xml should be changed to 
reference the new CDT one (org.eclipse.cdt.autotools). Other than that, 
everything else from linuxtools remains the same.

-- Jeff J.

On 03/20/2012 03:36 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
> Hey, Beth. The changes are already applied for Linux tools. I don't
> think I need to change them any further at this point, at least for M6.
>
> From: Beth Tibbitts <tibbitts@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tibbitts@xxxxxxxxxx>>
> Reply-To: Eclipse Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:21:13 -0400
> To: Eclipse Packaging Project <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Subject: [epp-dev] Parallel Package leverages CPP package
>
> I was just going to update the Parallel package today too, Doug.
>
> My original contents were CPP, plus some of Linux tools and of course
> PTP and Photran.
> I think I should get the new CPP list now.
> Let me know when you are done.
>
>
> ...Beth
>
> Beth Tibbitts
> Eclipse Parallel Tools Platform http://eclipse.org/ptp
> IBM STG - High Performance Computing Tools
> Mailing Address: IBM Corp., 745 West New Circle Road, Lexington, KY 40511
>
> Inactive hide details for Doug Schaefer ---03/20/2012 12:20:43 PM---Hey
> gang, Looking through the changes Linuxtools made to thDoug Schaefer
> ---03/20/2012 12:20:43 PM---Hey gang, Looking through the changes
> Linuxtools made to the CPP package to merge the two, I noticed
>
>
>     From:
>
> 	
> Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx <mailto:dschaefer@xxxxxxx>>
>
>     To:
>
> 	
> "epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>" <epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>>,
>
>     Date:
>
> 	
> 03/20/2012 12:20 PM
>
>     Subject:
>
> 	
> [epp-dev] Include versus requires/import
>
>     Sent by:
>
> 	
> epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:epp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hey gang,
>
> Looking through the changes Linuxtools made to the CPP package to merge
> the two, I noticed that they Include their features as opposed to add
> them to the required section. I assume this was to allow for
> optionality. Should we be including all our features this way? What's
> the difference between include and require?
>
> Thanks,
> Doug._______________________________________________
> epp-dev mailing list
> epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________ epp-dev mailing list
> epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> epp-dev mailing list
> epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev