Re: [epf-dev] tool integration, artifact tracking, etc.?

[Peter Haumer <phaumer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Absolutely, Greg. IBM Rational's Portfolio
Manager is addressing exactly these needs.  Check out the resources
below.  Also make sure to visit us a the Rational User Conference
(http://www-306.ibm.com/software/rational/events/rsdc2007/) were we announce
great new extensions to these capabilities. 

Exploring Rational Method Composer and
Rational Portfolio Manager integration
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ar-rmcrpm/

Sarbanes-Oxley compliance with IBM Rational
Method Composer and IBM Rational Portfolio Manager
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/jan07/mckenna/

PRJ310: Integrating IBM Rational Portfolio
Manager and IBM Rational Method Composer
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/rational/library/06/prj310/

Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.

______________________________________________________________

PETER HAUMER, Dr. rer. nat.
Rational Method Composer | Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software | IBM Software Group
Tel.: +1 (408) 463-5096
______________________________________________________________

"Sullivan, Gregory \(US SSA\)" <gregory.sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/24/2007 06:41

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[epf-dev] tool integration, artifact tracking, etc.?

Please excuse the naïve questions, but I’m
new to EPF.
 
Is there a framework for integrating tools
(Eclipse-based or otherwise) with processes produced using EPF?  Or
for tracking artifacts produced while following an EPF-generated process? 
Or for tracking progress / adherence to a process?
 
It seems like it should be possible to, in
conjunction with an EPF-generated process, answer questions such as, “What
are the detailed requirements for this system?”, “What tasks should be
being worked on now, and which are overdue?”, “When was this use case
developed?”, “What tests validate this requirement?”, etc.
 
The process should serve as a workflow and
an organizer of activities and artifacts as they are performed and produced,
respectively, over the course of a project.  That is, the process
should serve as an “active” tool rather than a static document.
 
With all the technical wizardry apparent
in the EPF tool, I’m sure you people are way ahead of me on this, and
I would appreciate any information and pointers you can give me.
 
Thanks much.
--Greg
--
Gregory T. Sullivan, Ph.D.
BAE Systems Advanced Information Technologies
6 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803
(781)262-4553
gregory.sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev