Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [epf-dev] Challenge - Five words for why architecture in OpenUP


I think this particular phrase is too general - besides, removing risks should be also a practice under the Evolve principle.
Focus on eliminating technical risk early to increase stability and predictability.

I go with this option:
"Focus on the architecture early to minimize risks and organize development"

Cheers,

Ricardo Balduino
Senior Software Engineer

IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational)
EPF Committer (www.eclipse.org/epf)



Jim Ruehlin/Irvine/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

03/20/2007 09:11 AM

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
RE: [epf-dev] Challenge - Five words for why architecture in OpenUP





We don’t mention any disciplines or practices in the other core principles. To be consistent, we could remove the reference to architecture and let the principle guide the reader to the discipline. Maybe something like:
 
Focus on eliminating technical risk early to increase stability and predictability.
 
- Jim
 
____________________
Jim Ruehlin, IBM Rational
RUP Content Developer
Eclipse Process Framework (EPF) Committer www.eclipse.org/epf
email:   jruehlin@xxxxxxxxxx
phone:  760.505.3232
fax:      949.369.0720
 



From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of "Jaana Nyfjord" <jaana@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent:
Wednesday, March 14, 2007 9:53 AM
To:
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:
[epf-dev] Challenge - Five words for why architecture in OpenUP

 
Hi everyone!

I need to collect some proposals and then get a vote on the best proposal
to be able to close the bug concerning the formulation of the architecture
principle in OpenUp.

A summary of the discussion so far, shows that

- this principle needs be formulated in the same way as the other three
principles, i.e. “focus on … to …” ?

But, we have NOT agreed on:
- what the fundamental purpose and meaning of architecture and
architecture-centric is and why this must be focused on in OpenUp

There are currently four different suggestions of how to present this
principle:

1. "Focus on articulating the architecture"
2. "Focus on the architecture to promote a shared view of the solution"
3. "Focus on articulating the architecture to retire risks early in the
project lifecycle."
4. "Focus on the architecture to retire risks early."

To resolve this bug, please consider the existing suggestions and let us
know with which proposal you agree, or propose a new core principle.

I expect to have your proposals by Tuesday next week (March 20) to set up
a vote and then resolve this bug before the end of M6.

Looking forward to some challenging creativity,
Jaana Nyfjord


_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx

https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev


Back to the top