Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-users] During synchronization a new object was found through a relationship that was not marked cascade PERSIST:

When you persist an object EclipseLink will discover all objects it is related to - it will walk the graph. If any objects in the graph are not managed (either through an explicit persist, or through a cascade) you will see that exception.

Michael Simons wrote:
Hello Tom,

Especially the SojournPosition is also referenced by the TourPosition and that relation is not marked cascade=PERSIST.
Does this mean when I want an instance (e.g. of SojournPosition) to be persisted without explicitly calling persist(), I must mark it cascade=PERSIST in any relation it is part of?

- Michael

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Tom Ware
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2011 17:54
An: EclipseLink User Discussions
Betreff: Re: [eclipselink-users] During synchronization a new object was found through a relationship that was not marked cascade PERSIST:

'hard to tell from what you have provided.

The mappings you haven't included, could easily be causing this issue. How are your classes becoming managed? Are there other non-cascaded mappings on any of the objects being persisted? Are they referencing elements that are causing the problem? (i.e. Do both Sojourn and SojournPosition have no other relationships)

-Tom

Michael Simons wrote:
Hello Tom,

AFAIK it is that simple:

class Sojourn {
// ...
	
	/** Set of sorted references to tour-stops that take place at this sojourn. Please remind that these are also part of a tour. */
	@OneToMany(cascade = {CascadeType.PERSIST, CascadeType.DETACH, CascadeType.REFRESH, CascadeType.REMOVE, CascadeType.MERGE}, fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "sojourn")
	@JoinFetch(value=JoinFetchType.OUTER)
	private Set<SojournPosition>	positions;

	/**
	 * Creates a SojournPosition that references the given TourPosition and inserts it to the set of psoitions.
	 */
	public SojournPosition addTourPosition (int index, TourPosition s) {
		if (index < 0)
			throw new IllegalArgumentException (String.format ("Value %d for index is too small.", index));
		List<SojournPosition> sorted = getPositionsBySeq ();
		if (index > sorted.size ())
			throw new IllegalArgumentException (String.format ("Value %d for index is too big.", index));
		if (index == sorted.size ()) {
			if (positions == null) positions = new HashSet<SojournPosition>();
			SojournPosition sp = new SojournPosition (this, s, index);
			positions.add (sp);
			return sp;
		} else {
			SojournPosition sp = new SojournPosition (this, s, index);
			List<SojournPosition> positions = getPositionsBySeq();
			for(int i = index; i < positions.size(); i++){
				SojournPosition tempPos = positions.get(i);
				tempPos.setIndex(tempPos.getIndex() + 1);
			}
			positions.add (sp);
			return sp;
		}
	}
}

class SojournPosition {
// ...
	@ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
	@JoinColumn(name="sojourn_id", nullable=false)
    @ForeignKey(onDelete=ForeignKeyType.CASCADE, onUpdate=ForeignKeyType.RESTRICT) // That's an annotation of our own.
	private Sojourn			sojourn;
}

- Michael

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Tom Ware
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2011 17:20
An: EclipseLink User Discussions
Betreff: Re: [eclipselink-users] During synchronization a new object was found through a relationship that was not marked cascade PERSIST:

You are correct (the key here is the lack of a cascade to a related object). Is your failing example that simple?

-Tom

Michael Simons wrote:
Hello Tom,

but isn't that what CascadeType.PERSIST is mentioned to do?
In the example given: If the instance of B referenced in A was marked cascade=CascadeType.PERSIST in A. Then I expect that this instance of B is persisted by EL, without a extra call of em.persist(). Am I wrong?

-Michael

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Tom Ware
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2011 17:11
An: EclipseLink User Discussions
Betreff: Re: [eclipselink-users] During synchronization a new object was found through a relationship that was not marked cascade PERSIST:

This exception indicates that there is a non-managed object related to an object that is managed.

e.g. You have a relationship between A and B without cascade persist. You create an A, related it to a B and then persist the A without persisting the B.

-Tom

Michael Simons wrote:
Hello,

I've got the exception mentioned in the subject although the relation is marked cascade PERSIST.

Any ideas what might cause this?

Is this a known bug?

We're using EL 2.1.3

Kind Regards,

Michael Simons


------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users


Back to the top