Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [eclipselink-users] During synchronization a new object was found through a relationship that was not marked cascade PERSIST:

Hello Tom,

AFAIK it is that simple:

class Sojourn {
// ...
	
	/** Set of sorted references to tour-stops that take place at this sojourn. Please remind that these are also part of a tour. */
	@OneToMany(cascade = {CascadeType.PERSIST, CascadeType.DETACH, CascadeType.REFRESH, CascadeType.REMOVE, CascadeType.MERGE}, fetch = FetchType.LAZY, mappedBy = "sojourn")
	@JoinFetch(value=JoinFetchType.OUTER)
	private Set<SojournPosition>	positions;

	/**
	 * Creates a SojournPosition that references the given TourPosition and inserts it to the set of psoitions.
	 */
	public SojournPosition addTourPosition (int index, TourPosition s) {
		if (index < 0)
			throw new IllegalArgumentException (String.format ("Value %d for index is too small.", index));
		List<SojournPosition> sorted = getPositionsBySeq ();
		if (index > sorted.size ())
			throw new IllegalArgumentException (String.format ("Value %d for index is too big.", index));
		if (index == sorted.size ()) {
			if (positions == null) positions = new HashSet<SojournPosition>();
			SojournPosition sp = new SojournPosition (this, s, index);
			positions.add (sp);
			return sp;
		} else {
			SojournPosition sp = new SojournPosition (this, s, index);
			List<SojournPosition> positions = getPositionsBySeq();
			for(int i = index; i < positions.size(); i++){
				SojournPosition tempPos = positions.get(i);
				tempPos.setIndex(tempPos.getIndex() + 1);
			}
			positions.add (sp);
			return sp;
		}
	}
}

class SojournPosition {
// ...
	@ManyToOne(fetch=FetchType.LAZY)
	@JoinColumn(name="sojourn_id", nullable=false)
    @ForeignKey(onDelete=ForeignKeyType.CASCADE, onUpdate=ForeignKeyType.RESTRICT) // That's an annotation of our own.
	private Sojourn			sojourn;
}

- Michael

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Tom Ware
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2011 17:20
An: EclipseLink User Discussions
Betreff: Re: [eclipselink-users] During synchronization a new object was found through a relationship that was not marked cascade PERSIST:

You are correct (the key here is the lack of a cascade to a related object).  Is 
your failing example that simple?

-Tom

Michael Simons wrote:
> Hello Tom,
> 
> but isn't that what CascadeType.PERSIST is mentioned to do?
> In the example given: If the instance of B referenced in A was marked cascade=CascadeType.PERSIST in A. Then I expect that this instance of B is persisted by EL, without a extra call of em.persist(). 
> Am I wrong?
> 
> -Michael
> 
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eclipselink-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Tom Ware
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. September 2011 17:11
> An: EclipseLink User Discussions
> Betreff: Re: [eclipselink-users] During synchronization a new object was found through a relationship that was not marked cascade PERSIST:
> 
> This exception indicates that there is a non-managed object related to an object 
> that is managed.
> 
> e.g. You have a relationship between A and B without cascade persist.  You 
> create an A, related it to a B and then persist the A without persisting the B.
> 
> -Tom
> 
> Michael Simons wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>  
>>
>> I've got the exception mentioned in the subject although the relation is 
>> marked cascade PERSIST.
>>
>> Any ideas what might cause this?
>>
>> Is this a known bug?
>>
>>  
>>
>> We're using EL 2.1.3
>>
>>  
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Michael Simons
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eclipselink-users mailing list
>> eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-users mailing list
> eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
> _______________________________________________
> eclipselink-users mailing list
> eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users
_______________________________________________
eclipselink-users mailing list
eclipselink-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users


Back to the top