| Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Architecture Council Subcommittees |
|
On 11/10/2016 06:32 PM, Wayne Beaton
wrote:
I propose that we refocus our monthly "all hands" calls to focus specifically on the responsibilities outlined in the Bylaws. We should, for example, highlight issues of concern for projects with regard to process and discuss alternatives. I'd really like, for example, to find some resolution on how we revise the EDP to let fast moving new projects release very frequently.So it's not really going to be about architecture then I think it's also worth renaming the Architecture Council by the way to something like "Projects support Council". As we also discussed on the call today, I think that we should stand up a new subcommittee to guide our efforts around the Language Server Protocol. We have several existing projects that are focused on this and have added several new projects. We have an excellent opportunity to provide guidance and coordination for these projects. The following projects come immediately to mind: Xtext, Che, JDT LS, LSP4J, and LSP4e (did I miss anybody?)I believe Dirigible is currently "watching" the LSP, not sure if it's going to actually jump in the train soon. Does the LSP integrations need a leadership? There was no "leadership" in the last 6 months, and yet it's been pretty successful and have brought several projects to Eclipse.org that have managed to coordinate properly. What is the problem we're trying to solve with a committee? As LSP is pretty related to IDE, and most if not all people involved in LSP are on the ide-dev mailing-list, why not just using this mailing-list for cross-LSP-projects discussions? Cheers, |