[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Architecture Council Subcommittees
|
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:51:50AM -0800, Mickael Istria wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 06:32 PM, Wayne Beaton wrote:
>
> I propose that we refocus our monthly "all hands" calls to focus
> specifically on the responsibilities outlined in the Bylaws. We should, for
> example, highlight issues of concern for projects with regard to process
> and discuss alternatives. I'd really like, for example, to find some
> resolution on how we revise the EDP to let fast moving new projects release
> very frequently.
>
> So it's not really going to be about architecture then I think it's also worth
> renaming the Architecture Council by the way to something like "Projects
> support Council".
Agree, I don't see how we can push architecture insights to such a
diverse community of projects.
> As we also discussed on the call today, I think that we should stand up a
> new subcommittee to guide our efforts around the Language Server Protocol.
> We have several existing projects that are focused on this and have added
> several new projects. We have an excellent opportunity to provide guidance
> and coordination for these projects. The following projects come
> immediately to mind: Xtext, Che, JDT LS, LSP4J, and LSP4e (did I miss
> anybody?)
>
> I believe Dirigible is currently "watching" the LSP, not sure if it's going to
> actually jump in the train soon.
>
>
> Who is interested in providing some leadership in this subcommittee? The
> first step is decide among yourselves who will take the lead, then connect
> with the webmaster to provision the required resources, and update the
> ''Subcommittees'' section on the AC Landing page. Let me know how I can
> help.
>
> Does the LSP integrations need a leadership? There was no "leadership" in the
> last 6 months, and yet it's been pretty successful and have brought several
> projects to Eclipse.org that have managed to coordinate properly. What is the
> problem we're trying to solve with a committee?
> As LSP is pretty related to IDE, and most if not all people involved in LSP are
> on the ide-dev mailing-list, why not just using this mailing-list for
> cross-LSP-projects discussions?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Mickael Istria
> Eclipse developer for Red Hat Developers
> My blog - My Tweets
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council
>
> IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
