Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Nominating Kim Moir

[Doug Schaefer <cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1

I care less about the published criteria and more about the council getting things done in the large, where the need is most. We have some serious issues that we need to deal with that no one else will, especially with the introduction of e4/Eclipse 4.0 and how to build this crazy thing. Having Kim on the council will facilitate that discussion and represent the most critical piece of that puzzle.

Doug.

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:14 PM, David Carver <d_a_carver@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

+1

Dave

On 03/26/2010 02:03 PM, Ed Merks wrote:

+1

Chris Aniszczyk wrote:

I would like to nominate Kim Moir to the Architecture Council.

She has been the force behind ensuring Eclipse builds and ships on
time. Her background in what it takes to ship Eclipse will be an asset
to the council as we face the challenges of an expanding ecosystem.
The more projects we get, the more complex the release engineering
gets. I believe she will have a positive impact on improving the state
of release engineering at Eclipse.

So, +1 from me

  

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.

_______________________________________________
eclipse.org-architecture-council mailing list
eclipse.org-architecture-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-architecture-council

IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to the Eclipse Foundation.  To be permanently removed from this list, you must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.