[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ecf-dev] New ECF system
- From: Wim Jongman <wim.jongman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:19:31 +0200
- Delivered-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=aZTQ8qcUYeGrYFLSdrpeU6LMUbXq9DNoaHTKZyqQGs99q4FqzZXFmvLegbc2hNMfMZ apr94bORlWorTxsSWTZeuAJUCQ/uc3viX6rSvsDtC9vFM0c/5yKcZxAYiV4BlfJSYOT9 G/PjvHSXdq0A8WqUK9E38GrjoWuX0ttzvvMP0=
16gigs memory and two processors. Low on the disk space...
We could get rid of a processor in favor of more disk?
Please let me know what you think.
almost 20% of the cost is made out of rack rails. (I envision that the system is inserted into the rack once and then removed once too, 5 years later. If you consider a startup I suggest the rackrailsing business)
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Markus Alexander Kuppe <email@example.com>
On 08/14/2010 11:23 AM, Wim Jongman wrote:Agreed, that's way too expensive.
> Hi Markus,
> 32 gig will increase the price with $2500. Also the memory is split
> between the two processors. The total amount of memory this machine can
> hold is 64gb. We might want to stick to this option and add more memory
> when prices go down.
My gut tells me two processors (8gig each) will serve us better.
> This brings up another question. Do we want two processors (8 cores in
> total) with 8gig per processor or do we want one processor with 16 gb.
Description: Adobe PDF document