RES: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ only on Galileo

["Paula Gustavo-WGP010" <wgp010@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I had some discussions with Christian about it. 

one option to keep the Ganymede support is to add like a development
build that is based on Ganymede. This build will only build mtj specific
code (no pulsar) and we can execute it weekly to make sure all code that
is there runs on Ganymede.

With that approach we can continue to run the official mtj build against
Galileo which make our life easier on the build environment.

:)
gep

-----Mensagem original-----
De: dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] Em nome de Kurzke
Christian-E11581
Enviada em: segunda-feira, 11 de maio de 2009 15:26
Para: Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
Assunto: Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ only on Galileo

I agree with Craig, N-1 support is "very nice to have" feature, and we 
should keep Ganymede builds for now.

Please note, this is relevant for the "non-Pulsar" plug-ins, not the 
quick-install view etc. I'm fine if the Pulsar specific code has 
dependencies on Galileo.

-Christian





Craig Setera wrote:
> I have a concern with removing support unless it is necessary. This 
> assumes that users will either:
>
> 1) Be able to immediately jump to 3.5 (not have plugins that depend on

> 3.4)
> 2) Maintain two Eclipse installations
>
> Our internal tools are an example of #1. We are currently broken on 
> 3.5. While I hope to resolve that issue, until then I'm either stuck 
> with two installations of Eclipse or I can't use MTJ. I think this is 
> a very common occurrence for users early in the new version release 
> cycle. I'd really like to see us maintain N-1 support if at all 
> possible. Throwing out support for anything prior to 3.4 seems like a 
> no brainer, but 3.4 and 3.5 support would be nice.
>
> What would it take to run a regular build against Ganymede to validate

> it is still building?
>
> Craig
>
>
> On 5/11/09 10:45 AM, Hildum Eric-XFQ473 wrote:
>> As Galileo has always been the target for MTJ, I have no problem with

>> dropping the Ganymede support at this point.
>> Eric Hildum
>> Senior Product Manager, Mobile Developer Tools & SDK
>> Developer Platforms and Services
>> Ecosystem and Market Development
>> Motorola
>> Direct: +1-408-541-6809
>> 809 11th Avenue
>> Sunnyvale, CA 94089
>> USA
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:dsdp-mtj-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Paula 
>> Gustavo-WGP010
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 11, 2009 7:05
>> *To:* Mobile Tools for The Java Platform mailing list
>> *Subject:* [dsdp-mtj-dev] MTJ only on Galileo
>>
>> Hi MTJ,
>>
>> In some o four past meeting we talked about the possibility of 
>> keeping MTJ support both on ganymede and galileo. With the addition 
>> of all Pulsar tasks, it end up that current MTJ is only building 
>> against Galileo. MTJ runtime feature still installs/run on Ganymede, 
>> but there is no guarantee that it will continue installing since we 
>> are not building against Ganymede anymore.
>>
>> I will like to hear some thoughts about that. Is it ok for everyone 
>> to keep only Galileo support or Ganymede is mandatory for MTJ??? A 
>> single target platform makes our life much easier in the build 
>> environment. Since I maintain the build environment I would vote for 
>> Galileo-only J... but I don't want to take that decision alone
>>
>> J
>>
>> Gep (back from vacation)
>>
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
>> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>>   
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
> dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
>   

_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev