David,
My
thought was that should these also be in someplace more visible? Or is it OK to
have them deep down in the document?
Thanks,
Jimmy Mohsin
Cell +1-609-635-1703
From:
cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of David Whiteman
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 6:50 PM
To: Cosmos Dev
Subject: RE: [cosmos-dev] Update requested for COSMOS architecture
diagram
Jimmy,
My
understanding was that these terms would be defined in section 2.0 of the UG
("core components"), which is what you're working on. Is that
what others had expected as well?
David
---
David Whiteman | Tivoli Autonomic Computing
Eclipse COSMOS project committer | http://www.eclipse.org/cosmos/
david_whiteman@xxxxxxxxxx | 919-254-8224 | T/L 444-8224
Jimmy wrote on 04/14/2008 05:31:16 PM:
> Rich,
> Somewhere in UG and/or DG, we should
describe the following terms very clearly:
> Management Domain [even though this
does not live in COSMOS 1.0]
> Broker
> Data Manager
> MDR
> Data Adapter
> Do they already exist somewhere?
Currently, these definitions exist in the
> Glossary; however, since these are core things that any adopter would
need to know
> / understand, I think special attention should be paid to these…
>
> Comments?
>
> Thanks,
> Jimmy Mohsin
> Cell +1-609-635-1703
