Re: [cdt-dev] CMake plugins

[Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, the good news is that all we have today in the CDT is the Core Build integration and project templates. Plenty of room to expand and grow that in other areas, especially the editor. I look forward to all of your contributions and help.

Doug.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Martin Weber
> Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 3:22 PM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CMake plugins
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2017, 20:00:45 CET schrieb Doug Schaefer:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Martin Weber
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2017 2:53 PM
> > > To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CMake plugins
> ...
> 
> > > Or better, search for cmake in the eclipse marketplace to find
> > > what`s already there.
> >
> > It mainly comes down to licensing. These plug-ins are not EPL. They
> > also do not use the new Core Build system that we are migrating to.
> > I'd love to have the editor but the copyright holders would need to change the
> license.
> 
> cmake4eclipse is EPL licensed.
> 
> CMakeEd is CPL, which should be EPL compatible [1]. Since I am the current
> maintainer, I could ask the original authors to change the license, if you like.
> 
> >
> > Which raises the point, I also could ask why the authors of those
> > plug-ins didn't contribute them directly to CDT.
> 
> Regarding cmake4eclipse, I am the author and already announced here I would
> donate it to CDT.
> 
> /Martin
> 
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Public_License
> 
> 
> --
> Cd wrttn wtht vwls s mch trsr.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev