[cdt-dev] Is it a new bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cdt-dev] Is it a new bug?

From: Chen Rui <chenruis@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 22:37:28 +0800
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=Q9nVwKcZWiAlhJiG55H9HDIXdH3mvIt5S5Ef0egXkk2tJ0r9TzyEtHPmkUuekcWaZ/ Tt+aXxjSEMZpyy7/7AjMsNOCB+gs5/cH/uuifUplnO6wXk0uhJz7JMS38JAir/LDLqbA 7Q0lW7cgq2UNsI0PMFaC8FK9fNF1DxdR/aOUE=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

I found that, method ASTBinaryExpression.getExpressionType() dosen't return the correct IType when the given _expression_ is like "a+4", where one operand is of CArrayType, and the other one is of int basic type. The result was expected to be a pointer type, but actually it is not.

I think the author just didn't consider the case when one of the operands is of CArrayType

I'm not sure if it is a true bug! Could anyone explain please?

--
Chen Rui

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Is it a new bug?
  - From: Sergey Prigogin

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Warnings discrepancy between hudson and IDE
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Is it a new bug?
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] Fwd: Hudson build is unstable: cdt-nightly #156
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Is it a new bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs