Re: [cdt-dev] Is it a new bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] Is it a new bug?

From: Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 08:05:51 -0700
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date: x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=HnngBGdYlWV++aDje9eGi1PWUpNBKy7UxW7pu1WJk2OovyCQsyFXsXtzGHAmo5Lzs m/5AhzNsKDck1IzIALslQ==
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Looks like a bug to me. Please file in Bugzilla.

-sergey

On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:37 AM, Chen Rui <chenruis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I found that, method ASTBinaryExpression.getExpressionType() dosen't return the correct IType when the given _expression_ is like "a+4", where one operand is of CArrayType, and the other one is of int basic type. The result was expected to be a pointer type, but actually it is not.
I think the author just didn't consider the case when one of the operands is of CArrayType

I'm not sure if it is a true bug! Could anyone explain please?

--
Chen Rui

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev

References:
- [cdt-dev] Is it a new bug?
  - From: Chen Rui

Prev by Date: [cdt-dev] Is it a new bug?
Next by Date: [cdt-dev] Include path bug
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] Is it a new bug?
Next by thread: [cdt-dev] Include path bug
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs