[cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?

From: "Sennikovsky, Mikhail" <mikhail.sennikovsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 16:28:45 +0400
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://eclipse.org/pipermail/cdt-dev>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcWYJuQg41s4tPp9QRC24CL5g+ryDw==
Thread-topic: Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?

Hi,

There is one more bug reported yesterday related to MBS functionality. Bug#: 105754.

If a build artifact extension is changed from the default value, libraries and user-specified objects that are to be included while linking the build artifact are ignored.

I’ve got an easy minor risk fix for this which I attached as a patch for this bugzilla.

I propose fixing this for the 3.0 and would like to here others opinion.

Any comments/objections?

Thank you,

Mikhail

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Indexer enhancement entry
Next by Date: RE: [cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?
Previous by thread: [cdt-dev] CDT 3.0 RC3 Rebuild
Next by thread: RE: [cdt-dev] Bug# 105754: should it be fixed for the 3.0?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs