Re: [cdt-dev] open declaration vs open definition

[kesselhaus@xxxxxxx]

Well, I must agree to this. I'm more interested to the definition than the
declaration when following a control flow of a program (source browsing).

But then also the Ctrl+LeftClick on a function name should go to the
definition too. Maybe there could be a Shift+LeftClick to go to the
declaration?

> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Chris Wiebe <cwiebe@xxxxxxxx>
> An: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Betreff: [cdt-dev] open declaration vs open definition
> Datum: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:21:10 -0700
> 
> After using these features (which are very nice) for a while I'm  
> finding the key bindings "feel wrong."  I want to look at the code  
> inside a function so out of habit I hit F3.  But that takes me to the  
> prototype not the body.  Now I have to go back to where I was and try  
> again with Ctrl+F3.  It seems I'm fighting muscle memory all the  
> way.  I would guess that 90% of the time, Open Definition is want I  
> actually want.
> 
> Anyone else experiencing this?  I really think the keys should be  
> reversed - F3 for Open Definition, Ctrl+F3 for Open Declaration.  And  
> if Open Definition fails, it should fall back to Open Declaration  
> (e.g. If I don't have source for the function, fall back to the  
> prototype).  I realize this represents a slight change in behaviour  
> >from CDT2.1 but I think it makes more sense and is more "intuitive."   
> I also realize it is late in the game for CDT 3.0 but seeing as this  
> is a major version release, now would be the best opportunity to make  
> this sort of change.
> 
> Just my two cents.  Anyone agree?  Rebuttals?
> -Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
> 

-- 
GMX DSL = Maximale Leistung zum minimalen Preis!
2000 MB nur 2,99, Flatrate ab 4,99 Euro/Monat: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl