[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] Update on CPL to EPL transition -- help needed
|
Dirk Dorr contribution was just adding EM_AVR and EM_MSP430 to the Elf class.
I think this is safe since it just the additions of some constants and a bit
of code to an existing case statement (and can't be re-implemented any other way).
Dave.
Sebastien Marineau wrote:
Thanks Doug. In the meantime, I got an email from Hasse, so these should
fall off the list shortly. That will leave Dirk Dorr and Christophe Juniet.
Alain/Dave -- do you have any assesment of how much work it would be to
re-implement those contributions?
Regards,
Sebastien
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Douglas Schaefer
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 9:00 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Update on CPL to EPL transition -- help needed
Hi Sebastien,
Hasse's patches were very minor (akin to the ==). I think we
can make a judgement call that there is no IP risk with this code.
Doug Schaefer
Ottawa Lab, IBM Rational Software Division
Sebastien Marineau <sebastien@xxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
02/23/2005 05:56 PM
Please respond to
cdt-dev
To
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Sharon Wolfe <sharon@xxxxxxxxxxx>, mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
RE: [cdt-dev] Update on CPL to EPL transition -- help needed
Hi folks,
as a further update on this... as a result of the last email,
we received
responses from Stefan Bylund and Uwe Stieber -- thanks to both for
responding. We are now down to 4 people for completing the CPL->EPL
transition:
Hasse Hellberg (Lizsoftware) (win32 debug contributions)
John Madsen (Illura) (1-line fix for parser - PR # 71669)
Dirk Dorr (elf parser contrbutions)
Christophe Juniet (wizard code)
I have sent direct emails to the individuals above (if you
are reading
this, please respond). If we don't get responses by the end
of the week,
we will have to either remove or re-implement their
contributions from the
CDT head (3.0) stream, in order to complete the EPL
transition. This is
unfortunate, but we really will not have a choice.
John Madsen's contribution seems straightforward (change "="
to "=="); I'm
not even sure how one would go about re-implementing this any
other way.
On the other hand, I'm not sure how much code is involved in Hasse's,
Dirk's and Christophe's contribution. Doug/Alain -- do you
have any rough
guesses on this?
Thanks to all for your continued help,
Sebastien
From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Sebastien Marineau
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 9:23 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdt-dev] Update on CPL to EPL transition -- help needed
Hi folks,
I'd like to give everyone an update on where we are with the
CPL to EPL
transition. As most of you know, we produced a list of committers and
contributors to the various components of CDT and gave this
to the Eclipse
foundation. They have been contacting all contributors to get their
approval to re-license their contributions under the EPL.
Things have been
progressing quite well. We had over 55 committers/contributors on our
list, and most have responded. All that responded have given
approval to
re-license their contribution under the EPL.
However, we still have 6 contributors whom the foundation has
not been
able to contact (or who have not had a chance to respond). Contacting
these 6 contributors is very important, as to complete the
transition, we
need to either get positive responses from them, or
re-implement the code
that they provided to CDT. Here are the 6 contributors that
we have not
been able to contact:
Stefan Bylund (ENEA)
Hasse Hellberg (Lizsoftware)
Uwe Stieber
John Madsen (Illura)
Dirk Dorr
Christophe Juniet
If any of you are reading this message, please email me
(sebastien@xxxxxxx
) and CC sharon@xxxxxxxxxxx. If people on the list know the
individuals
above, could you either ask that they email us, or could you
send us their
contact info (up-to-date email address and phone #)?
Unfortunately, if we do not get responses within the next
week, we'll have
to look at re-implementing those contributions. I'm sure
everyone would
rather not have to do that :-)
Thanks to all for your help,
Sebastien
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev