RE: [cdt-dev] Red Hat contributions & final steps

[Thomas Fletcher <ThomasF@xxxxxxx>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx]On
>Behalf Of Douglas Schaefer
>Sent: September 14, 2004 11:12 AM
>To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Red Hat contributions & final steps
>
>
>Great news Jeremy!
>
>For plugin names, we've simply used org.eclipse.cdt.* for 
>other contrib 
>plugins like cppunit and the win32 debug integration. I'd 
>rather see that 
>continue instead of switching to org.eclipse.cdt-contrib.

In my discussion with the Eclipse namespace police, they are
quite adamant that project plugins only use their allocated
namespace (and below) so this means:

org.eclipse.cdt.contrib is ok
org.eclupse.cdt-contrib is a no-no

Also ... has there been any thought (at RedHat) as to the 
applicability of the profiler plugin to the Hyades project?  

Thanks,
 Thomas

>Jeremy Handcock <handcock@xxxxxxxxxx> 
>Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
>09/13/2004 04:26 PM
>Please respond to
>cdt-dev
>
>
>To
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>cc
>
>Subject
>[cdt-dev] Red Hat contributions & final steps
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>The RPM and Oprofile plugins that we've been working on 
>getting ready to
>donate as CDT contributions are ready!
>
>We wanted to take the time to do a small internal review of the plugins
>before opening them up, which is why things have taken longer than
>initally planned.  Through our internal review, we've produced some
>documents that outline the design of the plugins, as well as a 
>number of
>refactoring possibilities to improve their design.  These 
>documents will
>allow interested/potential participants to become familiar with the
>plugins quite quickly.  These documents will be posted alongside our
>contributions.
>
>I'd like to get input from the CDTers about the following:
>
>The plugins are now named com.redhat.eclipse.*.  Because they will be
>hosted on Eclipse.org, I assume they should be renamed to 
>something like
>org.eclipse.cdt-contrib.*?  How does that sound?
>
>Also, do you have a recommended project structure in cvs?  Internally,
>we use the same flat organizational approach that is found in
>dev.eclipse.org:/home/eclipse, but it looks like many new projects are
>moving more towards the organization described here:
>http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/~checkout~/org.eclipse
.releng.basebuilder/readme.html?rev=1.23


Thanks for your input.

Jeremy
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev


_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev