[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] rpm plugins
|
So would you say that a general packaging framework, with an RPM plugin as a
proof-of-concept would be more in line with the current approach?
Except for RPMs, I could imagine that people want to create other kinds of
packages as well, like Debian packages, tarballs, Windows installers etc.
Just my €0.02.
//Johan
Sebastien Marineau wrote:
The first question, though, is whether everyone agrees that this fits under
the CDT mandate, as opposed to "plugin central" or sourceforge. I guess
I'm looking for a concensus from the group here, as this is a departure from
the generic frameworks/plugins approach we have taken up to now.
If we get agreement to go forward with this, the next step is to send this
to John for his approval.
Thanks,
Sebastien
-----Original Message-----
Jeremy Handcock <handcock@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
06/17/2004 03:10 PM
Please respond to
cdt-dev
Rather than a binary-only distribution, we would really like
to see the
RPM and Oprofile plug-in sources hosted as a part of (or
alongside) the
CDT on eclipse.org, where all development would be done in the open.
I'd like to open up some discussion on how we can achieve this.
