[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [cdt-dev] Verifying bug fixes in two streams
|
>
> Hi CDT Dev,
>
> I've seen a few defects fixed in both Head 2.0 stream and in 1.2.1 stream.
> What is the intended process for verifying these defects? Are submitters
> expected to verify on both streams, or just whichever one is more
> convenient? Would it be wise to replicate the defects when they are going
> to be patched on two streams (because verification may happen at different
> times, and with different results)? In fact, would it be wiser to submit
> patches on each stream under a separate defect (because the patch may be
> different for each stream)? Or am I needlessly asking for more automated
> Bugzilla email?
>
All good questions.
The 1.2 Stream, is a maintainance stream. We need to fix some serious
defects that was discover after and was to late to fix for the GA.
Also partners will want to push in some specific fix that when possible we've accomodate
in the past(CDT-1.0, 1.0.1, 1.1 ...)
For the verification/validation ???
> On a side note, is there a canonical list of defects which 1.2.1 is
> intended to address?
>
PR that should also be fix in the branch are marked.
