Re: [cbi-dev] Code quality analysis on CBI

[Mickael Istria <mistria@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 04/05/2012 03:43 PM, Igor Fedorenko wrote:

Personally, I'd let each individual project decide if they want to use
Sonar or any other similar tool. Especially because it is easy to setup,
the value of forcing this at CBI level seems questionable.

The fact is that Sonar is easy to set up *if and only if* there is a server available for Eclipse projects somewhere. It is currently not the case. Although its usage could be optional, having such a server available part of the CBI (like Hudson) makes sense.
To be more clear: it is impossible to get quality analysis for Eclipse projects while there is no good quality analysis tool available at eclipse.org.

--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse developer at JBoss, by Red Hat
My blog - My Tweets