Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [bpel-dev] Re:GSOC project ideas

Hi Simon,

Thanks for the quick response. Looking forward to your suggestions.

Regards,
Chamith Buddhika

On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Simon D Moser <SMOSER@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Buddhika,

I am currently preparing a set of options ... pls. give me another day or
two

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards

Simon Daniel Moser

Team Lead BPEL Editor - Websphere Integration Developer (WID)
IBM Software Group, Application and Integration Middleware Software
Business Process Solutions Development 1





 Phone:            +49-7031-16-4304           IBM Deutschland                      (Embedded
                                                                                 image moved
                                                                                    to file:
                                                                               pic11157.gif)

 Fax:              +49-7031-16-4890           Schoenaicher Str. 220

 E-Mail:           smoser@xxxxxxxxxx          71032 Boeblingen

                                              Germany





 IBM Deutschland
 Research &
 Development
 GmbH /
 Vorsitzender des
 Aufsichtsrats:
 Martin Jetter
 Geschäftsführung:
 Erich Baier
 Sitz der
 Gesellschaft:
 Böblingen /
 Registergericht:
 Amtsgericht
 Stuttgart, HRB
 243294






 From:       buddhika chamith <chamibuddhika@xxxxxxxxx>

 To:         "BPEL Designer project developer discussions." <bpel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

 Date:       25.02.2009 11:32

 Subject:    Re: [bpel-dev] Re:GSOC project ideas

 Sent by:    bpel-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx






Hi all,

I would like to have any follow on suggestions on Saminda's idea so that I
can get started on it or any other ideas that are relevant to extending
Eclipse-Bpel project for GSOC 2009. Any suggestions are greatly
appreciated.

Regards,
Chamith Buddhika.

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:06 PM, buddhika chamith <chamibuddhika@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
 Hi Saminda,

 Thanks for the idea. It seems a good idea to me. I think what you meant
 was providing some functionality similar to JUnit for testing BPEL
 processes. This requires the designer of the BPEL process to be aware of
 the expected outputs from the process for specific test cases. So this
 requires on the part of the test case designer, some degree of
 understanding about the responses returned from partner web services for
 a particular test case as well, if I'm not mistaken.

 A little issue that came up to me was, supposing that we only have WSDLs
 of respective partner web services, determining the nature of the partner
 web service reponse for a specific test case scenario can be tricky since
 we may not know internal logic provided by the service. So for that I
 think we should have a set of responses collected from the respective
 partner web service for the expected outmessage to be sent by the process
 for the provided process test input, beforehand. Then we base our
 assertions on actual returned web service reponse with pre-collected web
 service response.

 I don't know whether I made myself clear enough on this. But I'm eargerly
 looking forward to hear about any suggestions, enhancements on this idea
 or other interesting project ideas.

 Best Regards,
 Chamith Buddhika


 On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Saminda Wijeratne <samindaw@xxxxxxxx>
 wrote:
  tough luck Buddhika. Since Nandika has already been working on the idea,
  I suggest you think of other aspects of a bpel processes. One idea came
  to me was to automate test cases. Testing manually a bpel process for
  many scenarios each time there are some modifications to the bpel file
  is a time consuming and inefficient process. If we could get the plugin
  to create test cases for bpel process and allow the users to
  run/automate the test cases using the ode engine it would benefit the
  developer greatly. Only drawback is that once a bpel is created,
  normally the process is never changed. So after that there will be no
  more use for the created test cases. May be we can extend the idea.

  Best Regards,
  Saminda

  buddhika chamith wrote:
    Hi all,

    Thanks for the idea. But since Nandika seems to be already working on
    developing debugging support for BPEL designer (he privately informed
    me of this after the idea came up on the list as well) I think I will
    have to rule out the possibility of doing this as my GSOC project,
    though I would have liked to proceed. So any more ideas on areas that
    can be improved, are greatly appreciated.

    Best Regards,
    Chamith Buddhika.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    bpel-dev mailing list
    bpel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
    https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/bpel-dev


  _______________________________________________
  bpel-dev mailing list
  bpel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
  https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/bpel-dev

_______________________________________________
bpel-dev mailing list
bpel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/bpel-dev

_______________________________________________
bpel-dev mailing list
bpel-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/bpel-dev



Back to the top