[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] How to remove "abstract" with AspectJ?
|
Andy Clement wrote:
>
> I see what you are saying though, that by ensuring there is a complete
> implementation of all the missing methods, AspectJ could consider the
> type no longer abstract, but I would need to think about it a little
> more. I'm not sure 'abstract' is only used when there are methods
> that are abstract, there are other situations when you might want to
> use it where, for example, you just want to prevent construction of
> that type.
Thanks Andy.
I'm sure there are other purposes of "abstract". But in my case, I
consciously explicitly want my abstract class to de-abstract-ize itself.
i.e. I'm simply using it to avoid typecasts while using @AspectJ
annotations. And I'm still happy even if this de-abstract-izing will only be
supported in build-time weaving.
Yes I'm using it with annotation style (there's no problem with code style
here).
Shouldn't this be something that AspectJ supports?
-----
http://www.Soluvas.com/ Soluvas - Making eCommerce Work for You
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-to-remove-%22abstract%22-with-AspectJ--tp27617645p27632734.html
Sent from the AspectJ - users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
