[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] set() pointuct and after() returning(Object o)

Does seem a little inconsistent.  Raise a bugzilla to track clarifying
why it is the right behaviour or fixing it.


2009/8/27 Simone Gianni <simoneg@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi all,
> I don't know if this is a bug, or if it's a known or wanted behavior, but
> using after() returning(Object o) on a set() pointcut does not weave it.
> Since documentation states that using Object in the returning clause will
> match also methods returning void, which it does, I would expect it to weave
> correctly also set() pointcuts, which obviously return "void".
> A normal after() advice (without the returning clause) will match and weave
> correctly, but makes it necessary to write the advice twice if I'm willing
> to trace all execution, get() and set() to trace an execution.
> This is happening under 1.6.5, both LTW and CTW, both from inside AJDT and
> from command line.
> Simone
> --
> Simone Gianni            CEO Semeru s.r.l.           Apache Committer
> http://www.simonegianni.it/
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users