Re: [aspectj-users] set() pointuct and after() returning(Object o)

[Simone Gianni <simoneg@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Andy,
raised https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=288577 . Sorry for 
not writing the bug earlier, but I found no mention on documentation nor 
any example of an after() returning(Object o) : set(), so I didn't know 
if it was a bug or something else.

Simone

Andy Clement wrote:
> Does seem a little inconsistent.  Raise a bugzilla to track clarifying
> why it is the right behaviour or fixing it.
>
> Andy
>
> 2009/8/27 Simone Gianni <simoneg@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>   
> > Hi all,
> > I don't know if this is a bug, or if it's a known or wanted behavior, but
> > using after() returning(Object o) on a set() pointcut does not weave it.
> >
> > Since documentation states that using Object in the returning clause will
> > match also methods returning void, which it does, I would expect it to weave
> > correctly also set() pointcuts, which obviously return "void".
> >
> > A normal after() advice (without the returning clause) will match and weave
> > correctly, but makes it necessary to write the advice twice if I'm willing
> > to trace all execution, get() and set() to trace an execution.
> >
> > This is happening under 1.6.5, both LTW and CTW, both from inside AJDT and
> > from command line.
> >
> > Simone
> >
> > --
> > Simone Gianni            CEO Semeru s.r.l.           Apache Committer
> > http://www.simonegianni.it/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> >
> >     
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>   


--
Simone Gianni            CEO Semeru s.r.l.           Apache Committer
http://www.simonegianni.it/