[aspectj-users] Re: aspectj-users Digest, Vol 49, Issue 22

[Kevin Roll <kroll@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mar 13, 2009, at 4:54 PM, aspectj-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> So there were classes with the join points in on the classpath that  
> needed
> promoting to the inpath?

Actually, no. A class on the inpath had a join point at a method which  
takes a parameter of class X. This class X was not specified on the  
inpath. Now, I might have screwed up and not put it on the classpath  
either. I guess I would have expected a ClassNotFound exception - but  
what I saw was that the class was woven but those particular methods  
were ignored.