Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ plans: 1.5.4 and 1.6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ plans: 1.5.4 and 1.6

From: "Michael Nascimento" <misterm@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:37:21 -0300
Delivered-to: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=azelrcqVtvhB2vyXGG5gmzAG4yMGk4rGYcEy/62ZhTTo+4w5idTUKw5DMCBbLAYeE3uF2IbCWGlpT9m9F5Yb+iYkANmM9Wr2LjSgjrIC7qX7OB2wSeiGMDIfPp1BiuzNrQpBjxHS3bLKmX2eO1arxshORJJCz9eVFy21WgRIlPE=
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>
List-help: <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users>, <mailto:aspectj-users-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

On 10/10/07, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The primary thing we need the users to do is let us know what they
> desperately need fixing or looking into?

This is a must have:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=86818

Even Spring needs it. The main reason we never considered migrating
genesis ( https://genesis.dev.java.net/ ) from AW to AJ is
hasmethod/hasfield support.

Regards,
Michael

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ plans: 1.5.4 and 1.6
  - From: Gijs Peek

References:
- [aspectj-users] AspectJ plans: 1.5.4 and 1.6
  - From: Andy Clement

Prev by Date: Re: [aspectj-users] Why declare warning: is not working?
Next by Date: Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ plans: 1.5.4 and 1.6
Previous by thread: [aspectj-users] AspectJ plans: 1.5.4 and 1.6
Next by thread: Re: [aspectj-users] AspectJ plans: 1.5.4 and 1.6
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs