Re: [aspectj-users] MethodDeclarationLineNumber everywhere

[Adrian Colyer <adrian.colyer@xxxxxxxxx>]

This attribute is extra debug information that AspectJ puts  
into .class files during compilation. It tells us the line number of  
the method declaration (as opposed to the line number of the first  
line of code in the method, which is all that is normally available).  
This enables us to shows advises/advised-by markers in the right  
place, and to give accurate line number information in messages etc..

Currently we always include this attribute, but I would accept an  
enhancement request on bugzilla to not do so when the -g:none flag is  
passed....

Regards, Adrian.

On 8 Oct 2006, at 23:41, Edward Povazan wrote:

> Wes Isberg wrote:
> > Are the warnings harmful?  Does the program work with the
> > aspects?
> > Wes
>
> Everything works as expected, I just don't want AspectJ artifacts  
> in every single class. Perhaps this is normal. Or perhaps I am not  
> specifying some option to the iajc Ant task, I am new to it and  
> have been using the Eclipse plugin until now.
>
> -Ed
>
> > On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 14:36:27 -0700
> >  Edward Povazan <epovazan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I am quite new to AspectJ - I started using it to solve a
> > > very specific problem which it does very elegantly.
> > >
> > > I am working on my final deployment ant script and I want
> > > to obfuscate my program, and yguard is warning:
> > > WARNING: Unrecognized attribute
> > > 'org.aspectj.weaver.MethodDeclarationLineNumber' in
> > > <insert method here>
> > >
> > > What is MethodDeclarationLineNumber and how do I get rid
> > > of it? I assume it is for locating lines in .aj source
> > > files. I am building with iajc and don't see an option to
> > > use to stop this.
> > > I get a warning for the MethodDeclarationLineNumber
> > > attribute for every single public method (haven't checked
> > > private etc.) of all my classes - *all* of them, my
> > > entire code base, not just those referred to in .aj
> > > source. Is this necessary?
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > -Ed
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aspectj-users mailing list
> > > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users