Re: [aspectj-users] MethodDeclarationLineNumber everywhere

["Wes" <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There should be no difference in the .class files produced 
using iajc and AJDT if the settings/flags are the same.

AFAIK, there should be no significant extra attributes in .class 
files that are not affected by aspects, and the attributes in the 
affected .class files are harmless (except to picky and ignorant 
decompilers).  Use AJDT's crosscutting view to tell which classes
are affected; if there are more than expected, you might need to
rewrite some pointcuts.

You can control the debug attributes, but I'm sure you've tried that.

hth - Wes

> ------------Original Message------------
> From: Edward Povazan <epovazan@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Sun, Oct-8-2006 3:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [aspectj-users] MethodDeclarationLineNumber everywhere
>
> 
> 
> Wes Isberg wrote:
> > Are the warnings harmful?  Does the program work with the
> > aspects?
> > 
> > Wes
> 
> Everything works as expected, I just don't want AspectJ artifacts in 
> every 
> single class. Perhaps this is normal. Or perhaps I am not specifying 
> some option 
> to the iajc Ant task, I am new to it and have been using the Eclipse 
> plugin 
> until now.
> 
> -Ed
> 
> > 
> > On Sat, 07 Oct 2006 14:36:27 -0700
> >  Edward Povazan <epovazan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am quite new to AspectJ - I started using it to solve a
> >> very specific problem which it does very elegantly.
> >>
> >> I am working on my final deployment ant script and I want
> >> to obfuscate my program, and yguard is warning:
> >> WARNING: Unrecognized attribute
> >> 'org.aspectj.weaver.MethodDeclarationLineNumber' in
> >> <insert method here>
> >>
> >> What is MethodDeclarationLineNumber and how do I get rid
> >> of it? I assume it is for locating lines in .aj source
> >> files. I am building with iajc and don't see an option to
> >> use to stop this.
> >> I get a warning for the MethodDeclarationLineNumber
> >> attribute for every single public method (haven't checked
> >> private etc.) of all my classes - *all* of them, my
> >> entire code base, not just those referred to in .aj
> >> source. Is this necessary?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -Ed
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> aspectj-users mailing list
> >> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > aspectj-users mailing list
> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>