[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] declare parents with super/sub classes
|
P.S. And I know you're thinking, why on earth does she want to do the
subclasses AND the superclasses? I'm wondering the same but the
distributed JVM doesn't run if I don't. I've emailed the original
developers to ask them what exactly is going on that it needs to be
this way but I won't get an answer for about another 8 hours with the
time zone difference :-)
Jen
On 4/11/06, Ron Bodkin <rbodkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Jennifer,
>
> What happens if you use this idiom to make subclasses of SomeType implement
> marker? I've used this before in cases where I didn't control SomeType but
> wanted all subtypes to implement a marker...
>
> declare parents: (SomeType+ && !SomeType) implements Marker;
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:aspectj-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baldwin
> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:02 PM
> To: aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [aspectj-users] declare parents with super/sub classes
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to use declare parents to implement an empty interface for both
> a subclass AND a super class. AJC will only do it for the superclass
> in everything I've tried. I know that this makes sense since the
> subclass will inherit the implementation. But for the example I'm
> working on, which is implementing of distribution on a JVM, I need it
> to be able to do this. Does anybody have any ideas on how to force it
> to work?
>
> Thanks,
> Jennifer
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
