Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [actf-dev] Validation component


I also think it would be benefitial for this technical session to discuss the API for exposing the IE DOM in ADesigner as many have expressed interest in this as well.

--> Mike Squillace
IBM Human Ability and Accessibility Center
Austin, TX

W:512.823.7423
M:512.970.0066

masquill@xxxxxxxxxx
www.ibm.com/able



Yeliz Yesilada <yesilady@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: actf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/14/2008 01:34 AM

Please respond to
ACTF developers list <actf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To
ACTF developers list <actf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [actf-dev] Validation component





Hi Kentarou,

It's good to hear that the Web validation part of aDesigner will be  
part of ACTF.

I will look into the validation code  
(org.eclipse.actf.examples.adesigner.eval.html ), but would it be  
possible to arrange a *technical* tele-meeting (a meeting oriented  
for developers) so that you can give us a broad overview/introduction  
to this part of the aDesigner code?

Regards,
Yeliz.
On 11 Jul 2008, at 04:29, Kentarou Fukuda wrote:

> Hi Yelize,
>
> Please excuse me for this late response.
>
>>> These are the two main reasons why we have decided to use aDesigner.
>>> Can you please confirm that aDesigner validation component will
>>> continue to be part of Actf?
>
> As Mike wrote, aDesigner component will continue to be part of  
> ACTF. ACTF
> is now owned by community, and we will support ACTF as one of  
> community
> members. If community members use/develop Java based (aDesigner) Web
> validation, we are happy to enhance it with you.
>
>
>> MAS: I'm sure it will be but Fukuda-San will need to confirm.  
>> Also, keep
> in
>> mind that, so far as I know, ADesigner's rules cannot be extended
> without
>> writing your own Java code and contributing to the ADesigner  
>> codebase.
> If
>> you're going to write code, you could just as easily implement the
>> requisite API that I discussed in my presentation. Of course, the  
>> choice
> is
>> yours.
>
> In aDesigner case, most of HTML validation code are separated from
> aDesigner and visualization engine.
>
> As you know, validation code are now in
> org.eclipse.actf.examples.adesigner.eval.html plugin, but it does not
> depend on aDesigner itself. It can be re-used from other
> implementation/application, and developers can add their own  
> validation
> code by using Eclipse extension mechanism (extension point:
> org.eclipse.actf.visualization.eval.checkers). So, developers don't  
> need
> to contribute their code to Eclipse. Of course, we hope they will
> contribute the code to ACTF and improve validation code with  
> community!
>
> In addition to this, when Weblo covers our IE browser component, of  
> course
> we can use it from aDesigner by using this extension mechanism. We  
> will
> provide a sample then.
>
> We are now refactoring visualization part for a preparation of ACTF
> release. We might be able to do some enhancements through this work.
>
> Best regards,
> Kentarou
> ---
> Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
> Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM Japan
> Tel: +81-46-215-4659
> E-mail: kentarou@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> actf-dev mailing list
> actf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/actf-dev

_______________________________________________
actf-dev mailing list
actf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/actf-dev


Back to the top