Bug 94746 - [osgi] local configuration uses absolute path to refer to shared configuration
Summary: [osgi] local configuration uses absolute path to refer to shared configuration
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Update (deprecated - use Eclipse>Equinox>p2) (show other bugs)
Version: 3.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.1   Edit
Assignee: Branko Tripkovic CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 88699 95223
Blocks: 88234
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2005-05-11 11:17 EDT by Rafael Chaves CLA
Modified: 2005-05-25 11:55 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments
patch for org.eclipse.update.configurator (16.32 KB, patch)
2005-05-20 16:19 EDT, Rafael Chaves CLA
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-11 11:17:21 EDT
Local configuration config.ini uses an absolute path to refer to the shared
configuration. This hampers the ability of moving the install when local
configurations exist. It should use an install relative path instead.
Comment 1 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-11 11:20:43 EDT
The property name is: osgi.sharedConfiguration.area.

Should investigate for M7.
Comment 2 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-11 11:38:13 EDT

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 88699 ***
Comment 3 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-13 16:10:17 EDT
org.eclipse.osgi is not ready for this yet. Should be addressed in separate of
bug 88699.
Comment 4 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-19 15:51:42 EDT
The patch for bug 88699 must be applied before this can be fixed.
Comment 5 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-20 16:19:57 EDT
Created attachment 21534 [details]
patch for org.eclipse.update.configurator
Comment 6 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-20 16:21:18 EDT
The patch includes the changes proposed to bug 88699. If this is committed, that
one does not have to.
	
Comment 7 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-20 16:23:26 EDT
Moving back to Update inbox and requesting review.

This changes need to be coordinated with the changes from bug 95223.
Comment 8 Dorian Birsan CLA 2005-05-20 23:15:35 EDT
Thanks Rafael, the patch looks good.

I don't have the "luxury" to any more than a simple test, and given the late 
development cycle, I'd suggest getting some extra testing for the other folks 
familiar with update (Dejan, Konrad, Branko).
Comment 9 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-24 14:42:51 EDT
Any chance this will be looked at soon enough for RC1? If you need any help from
my side, just let me know.
Comment 10 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-24 14:44:04 EDT
The patch to bug 94746 includes these changes, so if that one is fixed, this one
won't require any further work.
Comment 11 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-24 14:45:12 EDT
Please ignore the comment above, it was intended for bug 88699.
Comment 12 Jeff McAffer CLA 2005-05-24 16:16:21 EDT
so what is the status here?
Comment 13 Dorian Birsan CLA 2005-05-24 16:24:43 EDT
As I mentioned in comment #8, the patch looks fine to me, but this requires 
some extra testing, given that the code is on the critical path.
I give it a +1 with the reservation that Dejan is ok with it as well. I only 
did minimal testing and need others to verify it more.
Comment 14 Dejan Glozic CLA 2005-05-24 17:49:51 EDT
Branko, we need to raise the level of confidence that this patch is not going 
to introduce regressions. Please put Update through some tests and see if you 
get anything out of the ordinary (including re-running all the JUnit tests).
Comment 15 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-24 18:04:21 EDT
Please note that this patch requires org.eclipse.osgi and org.eclipse.platform
from HEAD or from tonight's build. It does not hurt to say also (again) that if
this patch is released bug 88699 is automatically fixed.
Comment 16 Branko Tripkovic CLA 2005-05-25 09:47:50 EDT
I ran all junit tests for update and went through some manual GUI based tests.
The patch looks just fine. Dejan, how should we procced now?
Comment 17 Dejan Glozic CLA 2005-05-25 10:51:04 EDT
OK then, lets apply it and watch carefully for any strange glitches when we do 
RC1 testing.
Comment 18 Konrad Kolosowski CLA 2005-05-25 11:24:14 EDT
patch released
Comment 19 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-05-25 11:44:41 EDT
Thanks!

Aren't you going to close it now?
Comment 20 Branko Tripkovic CLA 2005-05-25 11:55:18 EDT
FIXED, we should also mark bug
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=88699 as fixed