Bug 91418 - Two parallel jobs update my workspace
Summary: Two parallel jobs update my workspace
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: CVS (show other bugs)
Version: 3.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.2 RC1   Edit
Assignee: platform-cvs-inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: performance
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-04-14 11:27 EDT by Dani Megert CLA
Modified: 2006-04-25 13:57 EDT (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments
picture with the two jobs (6.49 KB, image/png)
2005-04-14 11:28 EDT, Dani Megert CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dani Megert CLA 2005-04-14 11:27:46 EDT
I20050413-0910

I started a workspace and two jobs started to refresh the CVS workspace. I would
expect only one such job.

Two workbench windows are open but only one of them has the Synchronize view open.
Comment 1 Dani Megert CLA 2005-04-14 11:28:30 EDT
Created attachment 19911 [details]
picture with the two jobs
Comment 2 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-04-14 11:43:00 EDT
How many synchronizations are in the sync view (i.e. when you open the 
synchronize drop down menu in the toolbar, how many entries appear).
Comment 3 Dani Megert CLA 2005-04-14 11:46:25 EDT
It just finished and there were two. I guess that's OK then. The question is
whether it's faster when they are not done in parallel but in sequence due to
the file system access.
Comment 4 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-04-14 11:56:54 EDT
Or whether we could just initialize the visible one and leave the other one 
uninitialized until it is actually selected. I'll investigate this possibility.
Comment 5 Michael Valenta CLA 2005-04-22 15:17:47 EDT
Fixing this would require a considerable amount or changes in the 
SynchronizeView. Given that we are gettinf close to the end of 3.1, I'm 
deferring this.
Comment 6 Michael Valenta CLA 2006-04-12 08:51:44 EDT
For the new model-based sync, initialization of the view must be triggered manually by the user.
Comment 7 Michael Valenta CLA 2006-04-25 13:57:15 EDT
Verified