Bug 79398 - [History] clean-up deletes state files regardless other references exist
Summary: [History] clean-up deletes state files regardless other references exist
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Resources (show other bugs)
Version: 3.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform-Resources-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 79357 93276 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-11-24 10:49 EST by Rafael Chaves CLA
Modified: 2019-09-06 16:13 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments
test case (4.49 KB, text/plain)
2004-11-24 14:33 EST, Rafael Chaves CLA 		no flags Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rafael Chaves CLA 2004-11-24 10:49:51 EST 
i20041123

When cleaning up the history, we are not doing reference counting, so we end up
deleting states for other files as well.
Comment 1 Rafael Chaves CLA 2004-11-24 11:22:03 EST 
*** Bug 79357 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Rafael Chaves CLA 2004-11-24 13:36:04 EST 
This is true for both current and new implementations. The new implementation
made it worse because cleaning (for the destination) was happening on every move
(not mentioning the in-memory collection of removed blobs was being cleared).,
so the source file would end up having states whose blobs were deleted.
Comment 3 Rafael Chaves CLA 2004-11-24 14:33:53 EST 
Created attachment 16109 [details]
test case

This seems to be a regression caused by the fix to bug 66369. This test case
fails on both implementations.
Comment 4 John Arthorne CLA 2005-04-29 15:33:57 EDT 
Marking 3.2 (unless you want to solve this next week, Rafael ;)
Comment 5 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-04-29 15:37:08 EDT 
*** Bug 93276 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Martin Burger CLA 2005-04-29 15:48:15 EDT 
Is there any chance of fixing this in 3.1?
Comment 7 Rafael Chaves CLA 2005-04-29 16:07:26 EDT 
Chances are slim to none. We have no time left.
Comment 8 Rafael Chaves CLA 2007-02-07 15:51:32 EST 
Not an active committer any longer, moving to the inbox...
Comment 9 Eclipse Webmaster CLA 2019-09-06 16:13:17 EDT 
This bug hasn't had any activity in quite some time. Maybe the problem got resolved, was a duplicate of something else, or became less pressing for some reason - or maybe it's still relevant but just hasn't been looked at yet.

If you have further information on the current state of the bug, please add it. The information can be, for example, that the problem still occurs, that you still want the feature, that more information is needed, or that the bug is (for whatever reason) no longer relevant.