Comment 1 Hubert Lingo 2004-05-05 06:00:24 EDT

The problem occurs on PocketPC 2003 and Pocket PC 2002.

Comment 2 Hubert Lingo 2004-05-27 05:59:00 EDT

Created attachment 11189 [details]
A preview of the problem.

Comment 3 Hubert Lingo 2004-05-27 06:03:02 EDT

Created attachment 11192 [details]
How the table should be displayed.

See the column spacers.

Comment 4 Steve Northover 2005-04-11 22:59:49 EDT

Chrix, any idea on this one?  We don't do anything special when creating the 
table.

Comment 5 Christophe Cornu 2005-04-12 10:25:04 EDT

I can show Felipe how to run the Pocket PC. It could be be something about the 
arguments we pass to LVM_SETCOLUMN which should not be set or may behave 
differently on Pocket PC.

Comment 6 Steve Northover 2005-04-12 18:25:09 EDT

Ok, show him.

Comment 7 Hubert Lingo 2005-05-09 09:40:50 EDT

Created attachment 20831 [details]
A small piece of code written in C showing the too large separators.

I adapted a small piece of code that displays a table on a Pocket PC. The
column separator seems to be too large also. So it doesn't seem to be a bug.

Comment 8 Steve Northover 2005-05-09 09:52:34 EDT

Thanks Hubert!  I wonder why the separators aren't large for other 
applications.  It must have something to do with the flags that we use in 
CreateWindowEx().

Comment 9 Felipe Heidrich 2005-05-09 14:45:08 EDT

Thanks, Closing.
If by any change you find out a workaround for this problem please let us know.

Comment 10 Hubert Lingo 2005-06-06 06:33:48 EDT

With this flag LVS_NOSORTHEADER, in the CreateWindow() method, it works. 
But now my question is how to change this in SWT. Which style is supposed to
change this behaviour.

Comment 11 Felipe Heidrich 2005-06-06 10:34:25 EDT

I don't think we can use this flag just to fix this bug. 
See Table#widgetStyle()

int widgetStyle () {
	int bits = super.widgetStyle () | OS.LVS_SHAREIMAGELISTS;
	if ((style & SWT.HIDE_SELECTION) == 0) bits |= OS.LVS_SHOWSELALWAYS;
	if ((style & SWT.SINGLE) != 0) bits |= OS.LVS_SINGLESEL;
	/*
	* This code is intentionally commented.  In the future,
	* the FLAT bit may be used to make the header flat and
	* unresponsive to mouse clicks.
	*/
//	if ((style & SWT.FLAT) != 0) bits |= OS.LVS_NOSORTHEADER;
	bits |= OS.LVS_REPORT | OS.LVS_NOCOLUMNHEADER;
	if ((style & SWT.VIRTUAL) != 0) bits |= OS.LVS_OWNERDATA;
	return bits;
}

Comment 12 Hubert Lingo 2005-06-06 10:42:11 EDT

I totally agree with you.
The behaviour of the table, with the LVS_NOSORTHEADER, is totally different.
The code you posted talks by itself ;-)

Comment 13 Steve Northover 2005-06-06 11:23:22 EDT

Ok.

Comment 14 Steve Northover 2005-06-06 11:25:56 EDT

This bug is a dup of 80392.  When we provide the ability to make the header 
unresponsive to mouse clicks, then this flag could be used on Windows CE to 
make the table draw as requested (but also disable clicking on the header).

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 80392 ***