Bug 46312 - ignored resources don't work for Directories
Summary: ignored resources don't work for Directories
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 39239
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Team (show other bugs)
Version: 2.1.1   Edit
Hardware: All Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform-VCM-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-11-07 17:14 EST by Douglas Robinson CLA
Modified: 2003-11-10 11:47 EST (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Douglas Robinson CLA 2003-11-07 17:14:14 EST
 
Comment 1 Douglas Robinson CLA 2003-11-07 17:28:01 EST
Woops, sorry I hit return by accident
Anyway, if you go to 
Preferences -> Team -> Ignored Resources

And you try to specify a directory like *3rdparty* or */3rdparty/*
or *\3rdparty\* or something like that it doesn't work..

Basically I add that to Ignored Resources and it will not ignore those resources..
Comment 2 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-11-10 09:26:27 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39239 ***
Comment 3 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-11-10 10:32:46 EST
The reporter believes this is a separate issue (excerpt copied from bug 39239)

We need the ignored resources fixed to work with an internal Version Control 
system.

This internal version control system only uses ignored resources.
And its not just a multi directory pattern it seems to be any directory....
Comment 4 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-11-10 10:34:52 EST
Can you give exact steps of the failure? Also, you may want to check with the 
provider of the plugin for your internal version control system. It could be a 
problem with the plugin itself.
Comment 5 Douglas Robinson CLA 2003-11-10 10:45:33 EST
Um, I don't believe this is a separate issue.... I was just trying to give more
support for dup  39239 .

I believe this is an exact dup of  39239 .
Comment 6 Michael Valenta CLA 2003-11-10 11:47:37 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 39239 ***