Bug 434107 - Discrepancy in what we build vs. what's in plan for AIX and PPC32
Summary: Discrepancy in what we build vs. what's in plan for AIX and PPC32
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: PMC (show other bugs)
Version: 4.4   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: 4.4 RC1   Edit
Assignee: Dani Megert CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Documentation
Depends on:
Blocks: 434511
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2014-05-05 08:27 EDT by David Williams CLA
Modified: 2014-05-14 03:09 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description David Williams CLA 2014-05-05 08:27:54 EDT 
According to 

http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=eclipse#target_environments

We are planning to deliver AIX on PPC 64 only. 

But, in our parent pom, and DL pages, we have both 32 and 64 bit. 

Which needs correction ... the plan? Or the build? Is this just an oversight since AIX is a "rare" OS? 

Such in in parent pom's target environments, we have 

            <environment>
              <os>aix</os>
              <ws>gtk</ws>
              <arch>ppc</arch>
            </environment>
            <environment>
              <os>aix</os>
              <ws>gtk</ws>
              <arch>ppc64</arch>
            </environment>
Comment 1 David Williams CLA 2014-05-05 08:28:55 EDT 
Dani (or Steve), can you give any insight here?
Comment 2 David Williams CLA 2014-05-05 08:34:50 EDT 
Just noticed another discrepancy ... we don't list Linux ppc 32 bit, in the plan, but, we do build it. 

So, again ... is plan or build out of date? 

For cross-reference, this effects "Sim. Repo" since we typically deliver "all platforms we have" to it. See bug 434101 for another error, which was more obvious since it is neither in plan nor in our build.
Comment 3 Dani Megert CLA 2014-05-06 07:58:41 EDT 
(In reply to David Williams from comment #1)
> Dani (or Steve), can you give any insight here?

They are needed. This is a bug in the plan.
Comment 4 Dani Megert CLA 2014-05-12 10:09:57 EDT 
Marking as fixed since it will be part of the draft plan update 2.