Bug 408888 - [release] rt.equinox 3.9
Summary: [release] rt.equinox 3.9
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Community
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Proposals and Reviews (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified   Edit
Hardware: PC All
: P3 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Eclipse Management Organization CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: Documentation
Depends on:
Blocks: 406441
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2013-05-23 15:28 EDT by Wayne Beaton CLA
Modified: 2013-06-17 12:10 EDT (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
wayne.beaton: pmc_approved+


Attachments
Approved IP Log (177.64 KB, text/html)
2013-06-04 09:31 EDT, Thomas Watson CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-05-23 15:28:49 EDT
We'll use this bug to track the Equinox 3.9 release for Kepler.
Comment 1 Thomas Watson CLA 2013-05-24 12:12:01 EDT
I have decided to input the release docuware directly into PMI instead creating a presentation:

http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.equinox/releases/3.9.0
Comment 2 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-05-24 12:43:40 EDT
(In reply to comment #1)
> I have decided to input the release docuware directly into PMI instead
> creating a presentation:
> 
> http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.equinox/releases/3.9.0

I created a review document based on this release:

http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.equinox/reviews/3.9.0-release-review
Comment 3 Thomas Watson CLA 2013-05-24 13:46:49 EDT
(In reply to comment #2)
> 
> I created a review document based on this release:
> 
> http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.equinox/reviews/3.9.0-release-review

Sorry, I should probably know this, but you had to do this explicitly or is this something that happens automatically?  If I change the content in PMI will it be reflected automatically or do I have to ask you to regenerate the review doc for me?
Comment 4 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-05-24 14:05:15 EDT
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > 
> > I created a review document based on this release:
> > 
> > http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.equinox/reviews/3.9.0-release-review
> 
> Sorry, I should probably know this, but you had to do this explicitly or is
> this something that happens automatically?  If I change the content in PMI
> will it be reflected automatically or do I have to ask you to regenerate the
> review doc for me?

This is not documented well. I'll fix that.

The "review" document references the content in the "release" document. If you change it in the release, it is automatically reflected in the review.
Comment 5 Thomas Watson CLA 2013-05-24 14:16:36 EDT
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is not documented well. I'll fix that.

Thanks, I definitely like putting all the plan and release review content in one tool and keep it in a single spot.  It also helps me avoid creating slideware (which is a big plus for me).
Comment 6 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-05-24 14:36:09 EDT
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > This is not documented well. I'll fix that.
> 
> Thanks, I definitely like putting all the plan and release review content in
> one tool and keep it in a single spot.  It also helps me avoid creating
> slideware (which is a big plus for me).

Great. That was the intent.
Comment 7 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-05-27 16:44:48 EDT
Outstanding CQ have been processed by the IP Team.

I have resubmitted the log for their review on Tom's behalf.
Comment 8 Thomas Watson CLA 2013-06-04 09:31:09 EDT
Created attachment 231936 [details]
Approved IP Log
Comment 9 Thomas Watson CLA 2013-06-04 09:35:49 EDT
PMC approved [1] release material is in the PMI tool [2].

[1] - http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/rt-pmc/msg03496.html
[2] - http://projects.eclipse.org/projects/rt.equinox/reviews/3.9.0-release-review
Comment 10 Wayne Beaton CLA 2013-06-17 12:10:42 EDT
I declare this review successful! Please continue with your release.