Bug 39034 - [JFace] Provide a common Command and CommandStack framework
Summary: [JFace] Provide a common Command and CommandStack framework
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 37716
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 2.1   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P3 critical (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Nick Edgar CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-06-17 14:27 EDT by Randy Hudson CLA
Modified: 2003-09-18 09:13 EDT (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Command and command stack types (5.49 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-06-17 14:30 EDT, Randy Hudson CLA
no flags Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Randy Hudson CLA 2003-06-17 14:27:52 EDT
GEF and EMF both provide a command infrastructure.  This should be pushed up to 
the platform for interoperability.
Comment 1 Randy Hudson CLA 2003-06-17 14:30:34 EDT
Created attachment 5217 [details]
Command and command stack types

This was targeted for JFace originally, but others have suggested that a
dependency on the UI is not acceptable.

Perhaps the commands can still go into the "UI" component, but as a standalone,
non-UI plug-in, similar to IDocument stuff in the text plugin.
Comment 2 Debbie Wilson CLA 2003-06-18 14:40:05 EDT
Nick, this could be JFace/Text but it looks like UI might have to get involved 
to.  Will watch to see if this needs to move.
Comment 3 Nick Edgar CLA 2003-06-19 11:43:20 EDT
We have an R3.0 plan item for this, but it's currently deferred.
Unfortunately, we cannot simply release your patch since it does not meet the 
needs of the Text and JDT teams (based on our last round of this in R2.1).
We would also need to gather the requirements from other teams who are 
interested in this item, e.g. Lotus.

We are currently unable to devote resources to this without detracting from the 
committed and proposed plan items.  However, if you would like to pursue this 
requirements gathering effort yourself, and come up with a proposal, we could 
use the help.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 37716 ***
Comment 4 Randy Hudson CLA 2003-06-19 13:43:55 EDT
I'm curious, in what way does it not meet the needs of the Text and JDT teams? 
I don't recall any details being given. The comments Kai made were completely 
off topic since nobody actually believes that the actions made in the Navigator 
should be tied somehow to textual edits in a file.

And, who cares? Are you saying everything in the platform must be used by JDT? 
If that were true, the property sheet wouldn't exist.