38459 – [Tasks] Task view - columns got resized on startup

Bug 38459 - [Tasks] Task view - columns got resized on startup

Summary: [Tasks] Task view - columns got resized on startup

Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 38750

Alias:	None

Product:	Platform
Classification:	Eclipse Project
Component:	UI (show other bugs)
Version:	2.1
Hardware:	PC Windows 2000

Importance:	P2 normal (vote)
Target Milestone:	---
Assignee:	Chris McLaren
QA Contact:

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2003-06-05 05:14 EDT by Philipe Mulet
Modified:	2003-07-02 22:39 EDT (History)
CC List:	0 users

See Also:

Attachments
incorrect sizes for task view columns (54.71 KB, image/jpeg) 2003-06-05 05:16 EDT, Philipe Mulet	no flags	Details
Problem still present in 3.0 stream (82.82 KB, image/jpeg) 2003-06-17 09:21 EDT, Philipe Mulet	no flags	Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Philipe Mulet

2003-06-05 05:14:56 EDT

Build 20030604

When restarting a workspace previously opened with a 2.1.1 build, the task view 
columns got resized to an equal size for all of them (see attachment). 

The net results is quite misleading since some columns should be small.

Comment 1 Philipe Mulet

2003-06-05 05:16:52 EDT

Created attachment 5065 [details]
incorrect sizes for task view columns

Comment 2 Philipe Mulet

2003-06-05 05:18:21 EDT

Actually, I hadn't noticed the separation in between task/problem views. The 
problem rather seem that the task view column sizes are wrong, and can't be 
resized afterwards.

Comment 3 Bart Vanhaute

2003-06-05 16:53:52 EDT

i see the same problem in I20030604 on Linux-GTK. The column width of the first
two of a task list is too big, and not resizeble.

Comment 4 Philipe Mulet

2003-06-17 09:21:02 EDT

Problem is still here in 20030611

Comment 5 Philipe Mulet

2003-06-17 09:21:44 EDT

Created attachment 5209 [details]
Problem still present in 3.0 stream

Comment 6 Nick Edgar

2003-07-02 22:39:56 EDT


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38750 ***