Bug 375920 - Eclipse is not being built anymore
Summary: Eclipse is not being built anymore
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 355430
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Releng (show other bugs)
Version: 3.8   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P3 blocker (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform-Releng-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 355430
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2012-04-03 05:47 EDT by Krzysztof Daniel CLA
Modified: 2012-04-03 11:59 EDT (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Comment 1 Paul Webster CLA 2012-04-03 09:25:52 EDT 
we are transitioning to the eclipse.org hardware.

PW
Comment 2 Dani Megert CLA 2012-04-03 11:37:35 EDT 
(In reply to comment #1)
> we are transitioning to the eclipse.org hardware.
> 
> PW

Paul is there any ETA? Why did we stop the normal N-builds before having a working solution?
Comment 3 Paul Webster CLA 2012-04-03 11:42:23 EDT 
(In reply to comment #2)
> 
> Paul is there any ETA? Why did we stop the normal N-builds before having a
> working solution?

We lost the normal builds when Kim left (the IBM ones).  It was either spend time fixing scripts to continue building within IBM or spend the time fixing the scripts to build on the foundation hardware.

PW
Comment 4 Dani Megert CLA 2012-04-03 11:51:20 EDT 
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > 
> > Paul is there any ETA? Why did we stop the normal N-builds before having a
> > working solution?
> 
> We lost the normal builds when Kim left (the IBM ones).  It was either spend
> time fixing scripts to continue building within IBM

But they weren't broken, were they? We could have just let them run until something really breaks and not going for I-builds.
Comment 5 Paul Webster CLA 2012-04-03 11:56:51 EDT 
(In reply to comment #4)
> But they weren't broken, were they? We could have just let them run until
> something really breaks and not going for I-builds.

They were broken as far as I know.  Kim's internal userid was deactivated, and we could no longer use her committer ID to sign or push to the foundation.

PW
Comment 6 John Arthorne CLA 2012-04-03 11:59:53 EDT 
(In reply to comment #4)
> But they weren't broken, were they? We could have just let them run until
> something really breaks and not going for I-builds.

Yes her IBM account has been deactivated. Also the physical Eclipse build lab at IBM is being dismantled this week. Our office is moving and we do not have a build lab in the new location. The plan all along was to move builds to eclipse.org and we have now run out of time.

I'm going to mark as dup of bug 355430 since that is where all relevant progress is being discussed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 355430 ***