Comment 1 Jeff Douglas 2012-03-06 07:45:40 EST

Will asked to have his comments added:

I noticed the code generated for a simple literal number is fairly complex. For
example, I have a library with these 2 functions:

    function test()
        testFunction(3, "Hey");
    end

    function testFunction(intVal int in, stringVal string in) returns (int)
        // do something
        return (0);
    end


The generated code is:

    public void test() {
        int eze$Temp1;
        eze$Temp1 = (int)(short)((short) 3);
        testFunction(eze$Temp1, "Hey");
    }
    public int testFunction(Integer intVal, String stringVal) {
        return (int)(short)((short) 0);
    }

eze$Temp1 seems unnecessary and "3" could be passed directly (like "Hey" is
getting passed) instead. Also note that "return (0)" is getting expanded more
than necessary.